As someone who has never had traditional mentors, David Lynch's work was a quiet, surreal guide, teaching me to embrace the weird, the grotesque, and the sublime.
David Lynch's work was and remains a paradox: a dissection of the violence of patriarchy wrapped in surrealist beauty, often challenging, sometimes troubling, yet always transformative. His work defied logic yet felt achingly familiar. It taught me that art could be as fragmented, as messy, and as layered as identity itself. That it’s okay to be strange, to make art that doesn’t fit neatly into categories, to revel in the grotesque beauty of contradiction.
Criticism often circled Lynch’s portrayal of violence against women—something that could not be ignored. Yet within this violence lies a raw commentary on patriarchy and its destructive grip. Blue Velvet (1986) lays bare the seething darkness beneath suburban life, with Isabella Rossellini’s Dorothy Vallens embodying the trauma of objectification and survival. For me, Dorothy’s vulnerability and resilience echoed the stories of countless women and gender minorities navigating patriarchy—a raw map of a system that consumes and discards.
Twin Peaks (1990), his magnum opus, felt like Lynch’s deepest dive into the feminine. Laura Palmer, the ghost who haunted every frame, was not just a victim but a prism—a way of reflecting the cruelty of a world obsessed with purity, beauty, and control. Her suffering is devastating, but it is also illuminating. Laura’s story served as a stark reminder of how systems seek to police and punish those who exist outside the acceptable narrative. Yet her defiance, her ability to be more than what had been done to her, was a form of haunting rebellion.
Queer Subtext in a Lynchian World
Though Lynch’s work was not explicitly queer, it thrived in the spaces between binaries—the unspoken, the liminal, the grey area where definitions collapse.
In Mulholland Drive (2001), the relationship between Betty and Rita was as much about longing and intimacy as it was about the fragility of identity. Their love—and its unraveling—feels deeply queer, not because it fit into any neat category, but because it resisted containment. The film itself remained a puzzle, refusing to be fully understood, mirroring the way queer identities resist simplistic definitions.
Denise Bryson, the willful and charismatic transgender FBI agent in Twin Peaks (1990), stood out as a compassionate and surprising portrayal for its time. Played with dignity and humour, Denise was not just a punchline or a plot device. While the portrayal bore the marks of 1990s cluelessness, with limited consideration for who was being represented and how, Lynch’s decision to include Denise—and to approach her character with respect—felt significant. His continued vocal support for the trans community, both then and now, offered a sense of validation and solidarity that was rare in mainstream media. Her inclusion felt like a whisper of possibility in a medium that so often ignored trans narratives. And let’s not forget the iconic line from Twin Peaks: The Return, delivered by Gordon Cole—“Fix your hearts or die”—which became a rallying cry for LGBTQ+ fans and a powerful reminder of Lynch’s enduring allyship.
Then there's Eraserhead (1977), his haunting debut, which felt like a queer nightmare of repression and desire, a grotesque allegory of parenthood and masculinity that rejected the comforting linearity of conventional narratives. Watching it for the first time, I felt seen in a way that words could not articulate. Its jagged edges mirrored the messy collision of identity and fear that so many queer people navigate daily.
Lynch's storytelling often delved into the fragmentation of self and hidden desires—a theme that resonates with many in the LGBTQ+ community. His exploration of the uncanny and the surreal challenged traditional narratives, inviting viewers to question societal norms and embrace the fluidity of identity. This approach not only reflected queer experiences but also encouraged a broader understanding and acceptance of diverse identities.
Lynch’s commitment to ambiguity was a revelation. His films didn’t just offer space for interpretation—they demanded it.
They weren't passive viewing experiences but an invitations to look beyond the surface. Isn’t that what queerness is—a refusal to accept the world as it’s been handed to you? In films like Mulholland Drive and Twin Peaks, Lynch created spaces where the unspoken and the liminal thrived, reflecting the grey areas and contradictions of identity itself.
Surrealism as Resistance
Lynch famously said, “I don’t know why people expect art to make sense when they accept the fact that life doesn’t.” This ethos was at the heart of his work, and it’s why his films resonated so deeply with those of us who live on the margins. To be trans, to be feminist, is to live in defiance of the tidy, oppressive logic that the world imposes.
Lynch’s art validated the mess, the chaos, the surreal. It said: Your existence, in all its contradictions and ambiguities, is valid.
In Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me (1992), Laura Palmer says, “I’m gone, like a turkey in the corn.” It was absurd, nonsensical, and heartbreaking—a perfect encapsulation of Lynch’s ability to evoke deep emotion through the surreal.
His use of sound design—a hallmark of his films—was another layer of his genius. The industrial groans of Eraserhead, the ethereal score of Twin Peaks, the dissonance of Lost Highway—they were not mere accompaniments but emotional landscapes. For me, this sonic storytelling evoked something revolutionary: a visceral connection to the unspeakable. It was the sound of fear, of desire, of liberation.
Critiques and Complicated Love
Lynch’s films weren’t perfect. The violence, particularly against women, could feel unrelenting and, at times, exploitative. Yet his exploration of trauma often pointed back to systems of oppression rather than reveling in their horrors. That’s what made his work worth engaging with—it challenged you, even as it disturbed you.
For instance, Lost Highway (1997) explored jealousy, power, and the male gaze in ways that was as unnerving as they were revelatory. It was a meditation on identity’s fractured nature, a theme that reverberated through queer and feminist readings. Lynch demanded interpretation but resisted explanation, his art didn’t give answers—it gave space. He held up a cracked mirror, forcing us to confront our complicity and discomfort.
What It Means to Be “Lynchian”
Few filmmakers leave behind a legacy so distinct that their name becomes an adjective. To be “Lynchian” is to evoke a world where the ordinary collides with the surreal, where unease ripples through the mundane, and reality feels like it’s on the brink of unraveling.
There are times when life itself feels Lynchian—moments so surreal they blur the line between reality and a waking dream. In Mumbai, past midnight, the rain turns the streets into shimmering mirrors. A neon sign flickers outside a crumbling cigarette kiosk, where a shopkeeper hums a tune from a forgotten Bollywood film. The sound of rain falls rhythmically on tarpaulin-covered roofs, blending with the distant rumble of a train. A drunk man argues with himself in a nearby lane, his shadow warping his movements into something monstrous. Across the street, a man sleeps on a tarp, as if the chaos has lulled him into a dream. A stray cat watches from the shadows, its eyes glinting like tiny orbs of fire. An auto rickshaw barrels past, its passenger locking eyes with me for a fleeting, haunting moment. As it vanishes, a red scrap of cloth flutters to the ground, and somewhere in my head, a whisper lingers: “This has happened before.”
These moments—haunting yet strangely beautiful—feel like stepping into a Lynch film. His work has reshaped how we talk about surrealism and the uncanny, making us more attuned to the strangeness that lurks within the ordinary. It’s the moments that don’t quite make sense, the ones where reality feels like it’s on the edge of unraveling, that have taught me to see the world through Lynch’s lens: unnerving, fragmented, and oddly beautiful.
David Lynch’s Legacy of Dreamscapes
Today, as I reflect on Lynch’s passing, I’m reminded of a line from Twin Peaks: “The owls are not what they seem.” Neither was Lynch. He was more than a filmmaker, more than an auteur—he was a dreamer, a provocateur, a creator of worlds. His films are labyrinths I return to, not to find answers, but to ask better questions. In his dreamscapes, I found a home for all the contradictions that defined me.
So for urging us to see beauty in the grotesque, to embrace the unexplainable, and to always, always dream—I will be forever grateful to Lynch.
Disclaimer:
All images used in this post are sourced from the internet and used solely for educational and commentary purposes. They remain the property of their rightful owners. The opinions? Purely ours. And shared to inspire thoughtful conversation.